Anthropologists studying the Hopi people of the southwestern United States often characterize Hopi society between 1680 and 1880 as surprisingly stable, considering that it was a period of diminution in population and pressure from contact with outside groups, factors that might be expected to cause significant changes in Hopi social arrangements.

The Hopis' retention of their distinctive sociocultural system has been attributed to the Hopi religious elite's determined efforts to preserve their religion and way of life, and also to a geographical isolation greater than that of many other Native American groups, an isolation that limited both cultural contact and exposure to European diseases. But equally important to Hopi cultural persistence may have been an inherent flexibility in their social system that may have allowed preservation of traditions even as the Hopis accommodated themselves to change. For example, the system of matrilineal clans was maintained throughout this period, even though some clans merged to form larger groups while others divided into smaller descent groups. Furthermore, although traditionally members of particular Hopi clans appear to have exclusively controlled particular ceremonies, a clan's control of a ceremony might shift to another clan if the first became too small to manage the responsibility. Village leadership positions traditionally restricted to members of one clan might be similarly extended to members of other clans, and women might assume such positions under certain unusual conditions.

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the explanation outlined in the highlighted text?

It fails to take into account the effect of geographical circumstances on Hopi culture.

It correctly emphasizes the role of the religious elite in maintaining the system of matrilineal clans.

It represents a misreading of Hopi culture because it fails to take into account the actual differences that existed among the various Hopi clans.

It underestimates the effect on Hopi cultural development of contact with other cultural groups.

It is correct but may be insufficient in itself to explain Hopi sociocultural persistence.


登录注册 后可以参加讨论